Special Report: October 28th 2008	Get your T-Shirt Here

America Under Siege: The Obama Coup Attempt

    by Colonel (retired) "RJ" Reynolds

The other day, I was watching the usual political rhetoric spewing forth from the major networks when it occurred to me that we are not in the midst of a usual election, rather a coup attempt.  Bold statement?  Not quite, rather, I have seen enough and both of my gloves are now off!
As you probably know, my background spans many years in many places around the globe covering several wars, skirmishes and uprisings serving the country I swore an oath to protect and serve, The United States of America, under the Constitution.

I will always uphold that oath and therefore need to hopefully shake up and wake up America to what is about to happen.

We all know that politics can be rough and that any and all parties are concerned with their own interests first, however, there are limits set by the populace.  The issue is when you have a media that is unofficially supporting a group, ideal, or candidate they sway common thought and opinion through persuasive or slanted coverage.
All reporting is opinionated.  Even images captured with any device only tells what is seen and by excluding or limiting field of view or focus you have then edited and created an "angle."  In all of my years I have never, I emphasize never, seen such a slanted con job by hacks parading themselves as professional journalists.  I have noted and documented over 450 slanted articles that misrepresent the McCain campaign negatively or prop up Obama as the new messiah in just the last several months.

There are many web sites devoted to the background of Barack (Barry) Hussein Obama and I do not need to rehash his dossier.  I am most concerned with the complete disregard for the obvious truth. Lenin and Goebbels both popularized the expression, "A lie told often enough becomes the truth."  Is it not ironic that Lenin, a Marxist, would describe the story of Obama, another Marxist, in today's news?

Marxist? Socialist? Communist? Let's explore the definitions:

Definition of Marxism: The economic, social, political, pseudo-scientific philosophy, theory, belief, or system based on the works of Karl Marx of Germany. The theory seeks the elimination of the notion of private property in order to gain control of the economic "means of production" by taking it from the bourgeois (the wealthy or propertied class) for the benefit of the proletariat (working class.) His philosophy of history was called "historical materialism" in which his goal was to bring about the end of history, by means of an eventual perfect, classless, utopian society he called Communism.

In the intermediary phase between Marxism and Communism which is called, alternatively, Socialism or the "dictatorship of the proletariat", the "Party" rules.

Do you recall the all too famous, "spread the wealth" statement by Obama?  Thank goodness for "Joe the plumber" to ask the right question and gain a glimpse of truth under the Obama facade.;  Connect dot one and proceed to the next square.  If you don't see it, reread the above definitions.

The press knows this but they don't care and they hate with a blind passion, real American's.  Who are they?  They are the ones that Obama ridiculed in a speech to high dollar supporters saying, "it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion."  Yes, I am a real American and I go to church, pay my taxes, and believe in the second amendment!  Am I bitter, no.  Am I angry to see my county taken over -- what do you think?

My old friend, Alberto, a Cuban immigrant and avid astronomer recounted the days of Cuba past.  The lifestyle that he grew up to enjoy and cherish and his astronomical gear that provided him a profession.  Then the Communists came into power.  First, his religion was denied to him, then his house that his parents built through sweat and blood, and finally his astronomy.  The State felt that he was better suited to relocate to a small apartment and take up another line of work and that his large home and property would be better utilized by others.  The Communists "spread his wealth."  Is Obama's ideals really so far distant from this?  I asked him if Communism ever left Cuba, would he return.  He said, "Return to what?" His Cuba no longer exists.

Should we be worried about the associations we keep?  Do you think that if I associated with any known racists or Hitler sympathizers I would be free to pursue political aspirations without reproach? Would it be alright if I did so in the past or if the associations were exposed of their extremism but, in the past?  Obama has so many connections to very questionable individuals and organizations that are either currently involved in criminal activity or have been, along with racists and anti-Semites.  Where will it end?  Rezko (indicted for money laundering, fraud, aiding bribery and extortion), Ayers (domestic terrorist), Wright (reported racist), ACORN (FBI investigations for voter fraud), Pfleger (reported racist), and Rashid Khalidi (reported PLO terrorist) -- the list goes on.  Mr. Obama is said to have greater than average intelligence and education, so why would anyone continue relationships with people that have such questionable backgrounds?  This is not a simple case of meeting a person here and there as they work or live near you but rather attending events, having dinners together, endorsing books and kicking off political campaigns in private homes (as in the case with Ayers).  The media and, of course, the educational communities protect individuals such as Ayers and Khalidi describing them as "respected" in the field of education.  I wonder how many people are taking crazy pills these days?  Would Stalin be considered respected as well in his early days? The spin never stops.

Obama has many tens of millions, yes, I said tens of millions more dollars than McCain or any other candidate in political history.  Is this wrong?  No.  Does it matter?  Maybe.  Where does all this money come from?  We don't know.  Some suspect that it is tied to foreign sources closely associated with terrorists just as the suppositions as to where Obama's funds for his education came from as well.  It is very expensive to pursue education as he did and his sources have never been fully disclosed.  His papers from school are also locked away as is his wife's thesis which is said to contain many anti Caucasian sentiments.

Why should I or anyone else care to explore Obama's background?  Does not a man's associations tell us about who they are inside?  Do I need to remind anyone that America is about to put this person into the highest office in the land with control of the most powerful nation in the world?  It is that "little" detail that demands a candidate be examined in the most scrutinizing way possible in order for the population to make a good informed decision.

Obama has so much going for his campaign on paper, incredible amounts of money, 90% or more of the media (print and electronic), vocal and highly known figures such as actors, economists, etc., volunteers and more so why is he nearly within the margin of error for a statistical tie with McCain?

Hint: Americans are not that stupid to be easily fooled!  Those angry bitter people clinging to their guns and religion may not all have Harvard degrees, friends such as Oprah or Warren Buffett (who have more wealth than most countries), or infatuated media in their pockets, but I will tell you what they do have.  They have the sense to know a wolf in sheep's clothing.

 Although Obama may succeed in his Coup attempt on November 4th, 2008, and take the highest office in the land (even though he would not be able to obtain any government security clearance with his associations alone), those 49% who oppose him, the "real" Americans, can "hope" for real needed "change" in 2012!

It is not just the fact that Obama, a junior US Senator who has only had a little over 100 days of attendance, voted "present" on many hard hitting bills, has no executive experience, has radical ties to very questionable people and organizations, and is one of the most extreme left politicians of all time, it is that we are in an economic crisis that requires a seasoned and experienced captain at the controls. We can not "hope" that things will turn out alright with on the job training or with a "crisis" in the first term!

The Obama craze is nothing more than a real life example of Hans Christian Anderson's "The Emperor's New Clothes" but I pray that I am wrong about the outcome this election Tuesday and the following dystopia.

COL (ret) "RJ" Reynolds, is a respected international contributing journalist for over 40 years while serving in the Air Force.  The views expressed by Mr. Reynolds are those of his own and are not necessarily those of The Mr. Chris Show, Inc.